AWS Glue: The Complete ETL and Data Integration Guide
Server infrastructure with connected cables
AWS Glue has gotten complicated with all the job types, pricing models, and competing ETL approaches flying around. As someone who has built data pipelines on Glue for multiple production workloads — processing everything from small daily CSV imports to multi-terabyte data lake transformations — I learned everything there is to know about what works, what’s overrated, and where Glue genuinely shines. Today, I will share it all with you.
Best Practices”,mastering-aws-api-gateway-a-comprehensive-guide/” style=”color:#0073aa;text-decoration:none;”>AWS API Gateway: REST APIs
Core Components of AWS Glue
1. Glue Data Catalog
Probably should have led with this section, honestly. The Data Catalog is Glue’s central metadata repository, and it’s arguably more important than the ETL engine itself. Think of it as a supercharged Hive metastore — it stores table definitions, schemas, partition information, and connection details for all your data sources. Every other analytics service on AWS (Athena, Redshift Spectrum, EMR) can read from the Data Catalog, which makes it the backbone of your data lake architecture.
Best Practices”,mastering-aws-api-gateway-a-comprehensive-guide/” style=”color:#0073aa;text-decoration:none;”>AWS API Gateway: REST APIs
Component
Description
Use Case
Databases
Logical containers for tables
Organize tables by domain (sales_db, marketing_db)
Tables
Schema definitions pointing to data locations
Define structure for S3 data, JDBC sources
Crawlers
Automated schema discovery
Scan S3/databases and infer schemas
Connections
Network and credential configs
Connect to RDS, Redshift, on-prem databases
The Data Catalog’s integration with other services is what makes it genuinely valuable beyond just Glue. When you define a table in the Catalog, Athena can immediately query that data. Redshift Spectrum can join it with your warehouse data. EMR notebooks can reference it. It becomes a single source of truth for metadata across your analytics stack, which is a massive improvement over the old approach of maintaining separate schema definitions in every tool.
2. Glue ETL Jobs
That’s what makes Glue ETL endearing to us data engineers — the serverless execution model means you define your transformation logic and Glue handles all the infrastructure. No cluster management, no capacity planning, no idle resources burning money between job runs.
Best Practices”,mastering-aws-api-gateway-a-comprehensive-guide/” style=”color:#0073aa;text-decoration:none;”>AWS API Gateway: REST APIs
import sys
from awsglue.transforms import *
from awsglue.utils import getResolvedOptions
from pyspark.context import SparkContext
from awsglue.context import GlueContext
from awsglue.job import Job
from awsglue.dynamicframe import DynamicFrame
# Initialize Glue context
args = getResolvedOptions(sys.argv, ['JOB_NAME'])
sc = SparkContext()
glueContext = GlueContext(sc)
spark = glueContext.spark_session
job = Job(glueContext)
job.init(args['JOB_NAME'], args)
# Read from Data Catalog
source_dyf = glueContext.create_dynamic_frame.from_catalog(
database="sales_db",
table_name="raw_orders",
transformation_ctx="source_dyf"
)
# Apply transformations# 1. Drop null values
cleaned_dyf = DropNullFields.apply(
frame=source_dyf,
transformation_ctx="cleaned_dyf"
)
# 2. Map columns to new schema
mapped_dyf = ApplyMapping.apply(
frame=cleaned_dyf,
mappings=[
("order_id", "string", "order_id", "string"),
("customer_id", "string", "customer_id", "string"),
("amount", "double", "order_amount", "decimal"),
("order_date", "string", "order_date", "date")
],
transformation_ctx="mapped_dyf"
)
# 3. Convert to Spark DataFrame for complex transformations
df = mapped_dyf.toDF()
df = df.filter(df.order_amount > 0)
df = df.withColumn("year", year(df.order_date))
df = df.withColumn("month", month(df.order_date))
# Convert back to DynamicFrame
output_dyf = DynamicFrame.fromDF(df, glueContext, "output_dyf")
# Write to S3 as partitioned Parquet
glueContext.write_dynamic_frame.from_options(
frame=output_dyf,
connection_type="s3",
connection_options={
"path": "s3://my-bucket/processed/orders/",
"partitionKeys": ["year", "month"]
},
format="parquet",
transformation_ctx="output"
)
job.commit()
A few things to note about this code. The transformation_ctx parameter is crucial — it enables job bookmarks (incremental processing), which we’ll cover next. The DynamicFrame is Glue’s extension of Spark DataFrames that handles schema inconsistencies more gracefully. And partitioning the output by year and month dramatically improves query performance when downstream consumers (Athena, Redshift Spectrum) filter by date.
Glue Crawlers: Automated Schema Discovery
Crawlers scan your data sources and automatically infer table schemas. They’re incredibly useful when you’re ingesting data from sources where the schema might change over time or when you’re cataloging existing data in S3 that doesn’t have explicit schema definitions.
Job bookmarks track what data has already been processed, so subsequent job runs only handle new data. This is essential for incremental ETL patterns and dramatically reduces processing time and cost for recurring jobs.
That said, for complex orchestration requirements, I often recommend Step Functions over Glue Workflows. Step Functions provides more flexible error handling, branching logic, and integration with non-Glue services. Glue Workflows are simpler but less powerful — they work well for linear pipelines but struggle with complex DAG patterns.
Cost Optimization
Use Auto Scaling: Let Glue automatically adjust the number of workers based on workload characteristics rather than over-provisioning for peak
Optimize DPU Hours: More workers don’t always mean faster jobs due to diminishing returns and shuffle overhead
Enable Flex Execution: Lower-cost option for non-urgent workloads that can tolerate potential delays in execution start
Monitor with CloudWatch: Track DPU utilization metrics to right-size workers and detect waste
Glue vs. Alternatives
Choosing between Glue, EMR, and Athena depends on your specific use case. Here’s how I think about the decision:
Feature
AWS Glue
EMR
Athena
Serverless
✅ Yes
❌ No (Serverless EMR exists)
✅ Yes
ETL Focus
✅ Primary use case
⚡ Flexible
❌ Query only
Data Catalog
✅ Built-in
⚡ Uses Glue Catalog
⚡ Uses Glue Catalog
Best For
Batch ETL, Data prep
Complex Spark/Hadoop
Ad-hoc queries
My rule of thumb: use Glue for standard batch ETL workloads, EMR when you need full control over your Spark/Hadoop cluster, and Athena for ad-hoc queries and light transformations. Most organizations end up using all three in combination — Glue for data preparation, Athena for exploration, and EMR for specialized processing.
Pro Tip: Start with Glue Studio for visual pipeline building, then export the generated code to customize. This gives you the best of both worlds — quick prototyping with full code control when you need to optimize performance or add complex logic.
Senior Cloud Solutions Architect with 12 years of experience in AWS, Azure, and GCP. Jennifer has led enterprise migrations for Fortune 500 companies and holds AWS Solutions Architect Professional and DevOps Engineer certifications. She specializes in serverless architectures, container orchestration, and cloud cost optimization. Previously a senior engineer at AWS Professional Services.